Four facilities, three of them inside Salt Lake City, and one of the largest canning capacities in the western United States sitting among them.
Alphabetical. The one published figure — Uinta’s 2,500 barrels — is an annual commitment, not a first-run size, so it answers a different question and is marked as such. The capacity differences in the notes column will decide who answers you.
| Facility | City | Minimum run | Formats | Alcohol | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCG Copacking (Blue Chip Group) | Salt Lake City | Not published | Can | — | Salt Lake City. Three published collaboration models — tolling, hybrid and turnkey. Carbonated and still drinks, energy and flavoured waters. Cans only. |
| Big Brands Utah Co-Packing | — | Not published | PET, Glass, Can, Pouch | Yes | Dedicated Utah site of a group whose parent is based in Nevada. Formulation and co-packing for cold brew, kombucha, hop water, juice, spirits, beer, wine, cider and malt, in PET, glass, cans and pouches. City not established. |
| Silver King Beverage Company | Salt Lake City | Not published | Can, Can sleek | Yes | Salt Lake City. Integrated can manufacturing, filling and shipping; took over the former Vobev liquid operation in 2025. Two Krones lines at roughly 72,000 cans an hour. Water, sparkling water, soda, juice, energy, seltzers and spirits. |
| Uinta Brewing Company | Salt Lake City | 2,500 barrels / year | Can, Glass, Keg | Yes | Salt Lake City, established 1993. Own brands plus start-to-finish contract and private label on a Krones line at around 400 cans a minute, with analytical and micro testing in house. |
Silver King Beverage took over the former Vobev plant in Salt Lake City in 2025. Two Krones lines running on the order of 72,000 cans an hour, with can manufacturing, filling and shipping integrated on one site — sparkling water, soda, juice, energy, seltzers and spirits-based drinks.
Uinta Brewing, also in Salt Lake City, has been running since 1993 and does start-to-finish contract and private-label work on a Krones line at around 400 cans a minute, with analytical and micro testing in house.
BCG Copacking is the third city facility and the most explicit about how it works: three published collaboration models — tolling where you supply formula and materials, hybrid, and turnkey. Cans only.
Not one of the four publishes a minimum run, and none publishes a lead time either. On a line running 72,000 cans an hour, the minimum is often less about the machine than about whether a short run is worth the changeover — which is a commercial answer, not a technical one, and you will only get it by asking.
Big Brands Utah Co-Packing runs a dedicated Utah site under a group whose parent is based in Nevada. We could not establish which Utah city the plant is in, so the cell is empty rather than filled with a guess.
Where a cell on this page says Not published, we looked at the facility’s own site and found nothing on record. That is a fact about the market, not a gap in the research.
Alcohol in Utah carries its own rules. Three of these four list alcohol capability, but state licensing shapes what can be produced, stored and shipped. Confirm the specifics with the facility and with the state before you plan a launch date.
Ask about changeover cost, not just minimum. On very fast lines the real barrier to a small run is the time it takes to switch the line over. That cost is what turns a “yes we could” into a “not worth it”.
Tell us the product and the volume. None of these four publishes a minimum, and the capacity range between them is enormous — this is the fastest way to find out which one will take your run.