FindYourCopacker
Data · Beverage co-packing · Updated 30 August 2026

What beverage co-packers actually publish

Every directory counts facilities. This page counts what they will tell you before you call. Of the 227 US beverage co-packers we track, 35 publish a minimum order quantity — and only 12 publish one you could act on without asking a single question first.

Facilities measured227across 47 states
Publish a usable first-run floor125% of the database
Publish a lead time6of the 150 sites read in full
The finding

12 of 227 publish a minimum tied to one run or order

Not one of these steps is a judgement about the facility. Each one is a count of what is written on its own website. The drop happens twice: most publish nothing, and most of those who publish something do not say what it is per.

StepFacilitiesShareWhat drops out
Facilities tracked227the whole database, 47 states
Publish a minimum at all3515%192 publish no figure anywhere
… tied to one run or one order125%23 publish a figure counted per SKU, per brand, per year, or not stated at all

A further 8 facilities gave us a minimum directly, by email or phone. Those are recorded as declared, not published, and they are not counted above — this page measures what a brand can find on its own.

Field by field

The four things a brand needs, and how often it finds them

The middle column is the honest one. It counts only facilities whose site we read in full, so it measures their disclosure rather than our reading.

What a brand needsPublished, all 227Published, of the 150 read in fullDoes not publish
A minimum order quantitythe first question every brand asks35 of 22715%34 of 15023%77% of the sites we read
A production lead timewhen your pallets actually exist8 of 2274%6 of 1504%96% of the sites we read
Any certificationSQF, organic, kosher, HACCP…67 of 22730%45 of 15030%70% of the sites we read
A contact emaila way in that is not a form119 of 22752%81 of 15054%46% of the sites we read
Published — stated by the facility on its own site Does not publish — nothing on record, measured on the sites we read in full
Why no one quotes an average

There is no average minimum, and there cannot be one

The 35 facilities that publish a figure use 5 different units. The largest single group is 11 facilities. Any average across them would require converting barrels into cases or gallons into bottles — arithmetic that depends on a fill volume and a case count the facility did not publish either.

Unit publishedFacilitiesComparable with
Cases11other case figures only
Units (bottles or cans)8other unit figures only
Barrels (bbl)7other barrel figures only
Gallons7other gallon figures only
Pallets2other pallet figures only

This is why every directory quotes a range instead of a number, and why we publish the figures one by one with their unit and their source rather than a median. A median of 35 observations in 5 units is a made-up number.

The second trap

Published is not the same as usable

A minimum only answers a founder’s question if you know what it is counted against. Among the 35 published figures, 12 are counted against one run or one order. The rest are per SKU, per brand, per year, or say nothing at all.

The figure is per…FacilitiesWhat it means for a first run
run9usable as a first-run floor — this is the number a founder is looking for
order3also usable as a first-run floor — the facility simply words it as an order
SKU6multiply by the number of flavours you want to launch
brand2applies across your whole range, not to one product
year2an annual commitment — says nothing about one batch
— not stated13the figure is published, the period is not: you still have to ask
Method

Two denominators, and why the smaller one is the honest one

Two numbers, because one of them flatters us. Across all 227 facilities we track, 35 publish a minimum. But a facility whose website we have never read line by line cannot have given us one — that figure measures our own reading as much as their disclosure.

So the headline uses the smaller, harsher denominator: the 150 facilities whose own site we read in full. 34 of those publish a minimum, 116 do not. That is 77% — a lower opacity rate than the whole-database figure, and the one we will defend.

One caveat we would rather state than have found: the "read in full" count is a floor. Some entries were checked at source before we started marking them, so the true publication rate sits between the two columns above, not at either end.

Nothing here is converted. Barrels are not turned into cases, gallons are not turned into units. A conversion is a number we made up, and we publish only numbers the facility itself stated. Where a field is empty it says so.

Reuse

Citing these figures

Every number on this page is computed from the database at build time, not typed in. If you quote one, quote the date with it: 30 August 2026, 227 facilities across 47 states.

Corrections are welcome and get published. If you run one of these facilities and we have you wrong, write to us — the entry is free, and it stays free.

No charge, no obligation

Get quotes from facilities that fit your run size

If a facility has not published its minimum, the only way to know is to ask. Tell us the product and the run size and we ask on your behalf, at no cost to you.

We only pass your details to facilities that match what you've described, and never to anyone else. How we handle your data. No fee to you, ever.

Keep reading

Next